+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 17 of 17
-
02-25-2008 03:43 PM #11jrjespersen Guest
I have implemented this method but still encounter the same issue. I can correctly identify if a user ID exists using the GetUserIdentities() method, but when I call CreateUser(), the method either:
- Returns an error is the updateIfExists parameter is false.
- Returns successfully to the custom app if updateIfExists parameter is true, but the user ID is not added to the table ckbx_Credential. However, in this scenario, the profile data in the table ckbx_CustomUserFieldMap does get updated.
So, currently, I am unable to use the web service to recreate a deleted user.
-
02-29-2008 07:20 AM #12
Administrator
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Prezza Technologies
- Posts
- 227
I'll take a look at the code behind the scenes to see what is going on. The software should be checking the credential table. It's possible that the identity isn't being cleared from the identity cache when the user is deleted and that is what is causing the confusion. In any case, I'll take a look and get back to you to see how we can get you past this issue.
-Noah
-
03-03-2008 08:56 AM #13jrjespersen Guest
Noah,
I would agree with your thoughts. If I delete the user, reset IIS, and then recreate the user through the web service, the user is created.
It should be noted that the recreate problem occurs - when not resetting IIS - both when I delete the user from the Checkbox UI and the web service API. The difference in behavior is in which method I use to recreate the user: the Checkbox UI successfully creates the user (seemingly regardless of what's in cache) while the web service API does not create the user.Last edited by jrjespersen; 03-03-2008 at 12:32 PM.
-
03-04-2008 12:50 PM #14
Administrator
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Prezza Technologies
- Posts
- 227
Thanks for the additional information. I'll take a look at the source to see if I can figure out why the re-create works in one instance and not the other.
-Noah
-
03-19-2008 09:29 AM #15jrjespersen Guest
Do you have any additional information on this? I'm able to work around this issue, but it makes testing our custom application a bit tedious. An estimation of when this might be fixed would be helpful.
-
03-20-2008 12:16 PM #16
Administrator
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Prezza Technologies
- Posts
- 227
I'm still looking into the issue, but I expect that we'll have it fixed for the 4.5 release, which is currently undergoing internal QA evaluation.
-
03-24-2008 09:54 AM #17jrjespersen Guest
Great! Thanks for the update.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
